Absa Stockbrokers
FXGT
VS
Compare
Absa Stockbrokers
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
Compare Absa Stockbrokers and FXGT side by side on fees, regulation, platforms and our expert ratings. Find out which broker suits your needs.
Absa Stockbrokers
FXGT
Overall Rating
Tied
3.2 vs 3.2
Lowest Fees
Tied
0 vs 0 pips
Regulation
Tied
2 vs 2 licences
Min. Deposit
Absa Stockbrokers
$0 vs $5
Absa Stockbrokers
FXGT
WinnerAbsa Stockbrokers
FXGT
Lower feesAbsa Stockbrokers scores 3.16/5 while FXGT scores 3.16/5 in our independent rating.
Both brokers score equally — the best choice depends on your individual trading priorities. Read our full reviews for a detailed breakdown. Scores are based on our transparent methodology.
Absa Stockbrokers (3.2/5) and FXGT (3.2/5) are closely matched on our independent rating scale. The better choice depends on your priorities — fees, regulation, platforms, or available markets. See the full comparison above.
Absa Stockbrokers offers spreads from 0 pips, while FXGT starts at 0 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
Absa Stockbrokers requires a minimum deposit of $0. FXGT requires $5.
Absa Stockbrokers is regulated by FSCA, JSE, while FXGT holds licences from CySEC, FSCA.
Absa Stockbrokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. FXGT supports MT5.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.