Bitpanda
Pepperstone
VS
Higher Rated
Pepperstone
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
Compare Bitpanda and Pepperstone side by side on fees, regulation, platforms and our expert ratings. Find out which broker suits your needs.
Bitpanda
Pepperstone
Pepperstone is the better choice overall, scoring 4.1/5 vs 3.2/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Bitpanda offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowOverall Rating
Pepperstone
3.2 vs 4.1
Lowest Fees
Tied
0 vs 0 pips
Regulation
Pepperstone
1 vs 3 licences
Min. Deposit
Bitpanda
$1 vs $200
Bitpanda
Pepperstone
Bitpanda
Lower feesPepperstone
Bitpanda scores 3.20/5 while Pepperstone scores 4.12/5 in our independent rating.
Pepperstone edges ahead overall, but Bitpanda may suit traders who prioritise different features. Read our full reviews for a detailed breakdown. Scores are based on our transparent methodology.
Pepperstone scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Bitpanda holds a 3.2/5 rating vs Pepperstone's 4.1/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
Bitpanda offers spreads from 0 pips, while Pepperstone starts at 0 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
Bitpanda requires a minimum deposit of $1. Pepperstone requires $200.
Bitpanda is regulated by CySEC, while Pepperstone holds licences from ASIC, FCA, CySEC.
Bitpanda supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. Pepperstone supports MT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.