Higher Rated
Capital.com
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
In the "Capital.com vs FBS" broker comparison, the key difference lies in their target clientele and trading conditions. Capital.com, with its AI-powered trading insights and zero-commission model, appeals to beginners and those seeking educational resources, particularly in regions where it is regulated, such as the UK and Australia. In contrast, FBS attracts traders looking for high leverage opportunities and diverse account types, making it popular in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, though it is not available in the EU, UK, or US. Each broker caters to distinct trading preferences, with Capital.com focusing on accessibility and education, while FBS offers aggressive leverage and bonus programmes.
Capital.com
FBS
| Capital.com | FBS | |
|---|---|---|
| BrokerRank Score | 4.0/5 ✓ | 3.9/5 |
| Min. Deposit | $20 | $1 ✓ |
| Spread from | 0.6 pips | 0 pips ✓ |
| Max Leverage | 1:200 | 1:3000 ✓ |
| Regulation | FCA, CySEC, ASIC | CySEC, ASIC, FSCA |
| Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4 | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Mobile |
Capital.com is the better choice overall, scoring 4.0/5 vs 3.9/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, FBS offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowCapital.com
FBS
Capital.com
FBS
Lower feesCapital.com is a relatively new entrant in the brokerage industry, established in 2016 and headquartered in London, UK. It is regulated by several reputable authorities, including the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). These regulatory bodies ensure that Capital.com adheres to stringent standards regarding client fund protection, operational transparency, and ethical trading practices. Client funds are kept in segregated accounts, and the broker offers negative balance protection.
FBS, founded in 2009 and based in Limassol, Cyprus, is regulated by CySEC, ASIC, and the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) in South Africa. While FBS provides a similarly robust regulatory framework, it lacks coverage in major regions such as the EU, UK, and US. Despite this, FBS has a strong presence in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. FBS also employs segregated accounts for client funds and offers negative balance protection, but traders should be aware of the broker's high leverage offerings, which could pose significant risks.
Capital.com offers competitive spreads starting from 0.6 pips, with no commissions on trades. The broker provides a transparent fee structure without hidden costs, and its minimum deposit requirement is a modest $20. Traders can benefit from zero commission fees across asset classes, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious traders. However, traders should consider the overnight fees that may apply to positions held overnight, which can vary based on market conditions.
FBS stands out with spreads starting from 0 pips on certain account types, although standard accounts may experience wider spreads. Like Capital.com, FBS charges no commissions on trades. The broker's minimum deposit requirement is notably low at $1, which is ideal for beginners or those wanting to test trading strategies with minimal financial commitment. However, the high leverage of up to 1:3000 can result in significant overnight fees, especially for leveraged positions held for extended periods.
Capital.com provides a range of trading platforms, including its proprietary Web and Mobile platforms, along with MetaTrader 4 (MT4). The platforms are user-friendly, offering AI-powered trading insights and excellent educational content, although they lack some advanced charting features. FBS offers both MT4 and MT5 platforms, alongside its Proprietary Mobile platform, which provide more comprehensive charting tools and are well-suited for traders seeking advanced technical analysis capabilities.
For beginners, Capital.com is the better choice due to its low minimum deposit and excellent educational resources. Professional traders might prefer FBS for its advanced platform options and high leverage. In terms of fees, Capital.com offers more consistent value with low spreads and no commissions.
Capital.com
4.0/5
Choose Capital.com if you want…
FBS
3.9/5
Choose FBS if you want…
Capital.com scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Capital.com holds a 4.0/5 rating vs FBS's 3.9/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
Capital.com offers spreads from 0.6 pips, while FBS starts at 0 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
Capital.com requires a minimum deposit of $20. FBS requires $1.
Capital.com is regulated by FCA, CySEC, ASIC, while FBS holds licences from CySEC, ASIC, FSCA.
Capital.com supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4. FBS supports MT4, MT5, Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.