Higher Rated
Forex.com
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
In the FBS vs Forex.com broker comparison, the primary distinction lies in their target clientele and regulatory environments. FBS, with its ultra-low minimum deposit of $1 and high leverage up to 1:3000, appeals to traders in Asia, Africa, and Latin America who prefer a flexible trading environment and are comfortable with higher risk. Conversely, Forex.com, regulated by the FCA and CFTC, caters to more risk-averse traders, particularly in the US, offering extensive market research and a robust trading platform with a minimum deposit of $100. While FBS is attractive for those seeking low entry costs and high leverage, Forex.com is better suited for traders who prioritise regulatory security and comprehensive market insights.
FBS
Forex.com
| FBS | Forex.com | |
|---|---|---|
| BrokerRank Score | 3.9/5 | 4.4/5 ✓ |
| Min. Deposit | $1 ✓ | $100 |
| Spread from | 0 pips ✓ | 0.8 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1:3000 ✓ | 1:200 |
| Regulation | CySEC, ASIC, FSCA | FCA, CFTC, ASIC ✓ |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web |
Forex.com is the better choice overall, scoring 4.4/5 vs 3.9/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, FBS offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowFBS
Forex.com
FBS
Lower feesForex.com
FBS is regulated by several prominent bodies, including the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) in South Africa. These regulatory bodies ensure that FBS adheres to stringent financial standards and practices. However, FBS is not available in the European Union, the United Kingdom, or the United States, limiting its accessibility in these regions.
Forex.com, on the other hand, is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in the US, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Being part of the StoneX Group, a publicly listed entity, Forex.com offers a higher level of transparency and safety. Their robust regulatory framework allows Forex.com to operate in a wider range of jurisdictions, including the US, which FBS does not.
FBS offers extremely competitive spreads starting from 0 pips, especially on their ECN accounts. However, their standard accounts have wider spreads, which may not be as favourable for cost-sensitive traders. The broker charges no commission on most accounts, making it attractive for beginners or those trading with smaller volumes. The minimum deposit is exceptionally low at just $1, allowing traders to start with minimal risk. However, the high leverage of up to 1:3000 can be risky for inexperienced traders.
Forex.com provides spreads starting from 0.8 pips, which, while slightly higher than FBS's ECN accounts, are competitive and transparent. Forex.com does not charge commissions, aligning it with brokers targeting retail traders. The minimum deposit here is $100, which is higher than FBS but reasonable for traders looking for a reputable, well-regulated broker. Forex.com also charges an inactivity fee, which can impact traders who do not trade frequently.
FBS offers the widely recognised MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5) platforms, along with a proprietary mobile platform, catering to various trading preferences. These platforms are known for their reliability and comprehensive tools. Forex.com also offers MT4 and MT5, supplemented by its proprietary web and mobile platforms, which are well-regarded for their user-friendly interface and advanced charting capabilities. Forex.com's platforms are particularly suited for traders who value extensive market research and advanced trading tools.
For beginners, FBS is the better choice due to its low minimum deposit and promotional offerings. Professional traders may prefer Forex.com for its robust regulatory standing and superior research tools. On fees, FBS offers lower starting spreads, especially on ECN accounts.
FBS
3.9/5
Choose FBS if you want…
Forex.com
4.4/5
Choose Forex.com if you want…
Forex.com scores higher overall on our independent rating system. FBS holds a 3.9/5 rating vs Forex.com's 4.4/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
FBS offers spreads from 0 pips, while Forex.com starts at 0.8 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
FBS requires a minimum deposit of $1. Forex.com requires $100.
FBS is regulated by CySEC, ASIC, FSCA, while Forex.com holds licences from FCA, CFTC, ASIC, MAS.
FBS supports MT4, MT5, Proprietary Mobile. Forex.com supports MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.