Higher Rated
Interactive Brokers
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
When comparing Fidelity and Interactive Brokers, the key distinction lies in their market access and target clientele. Fidelity, with its focus on US markets and zero commission on US stocks and ETFs, appeals primarily to domestic investors seeking a trusted name with robust research capabilities. In contrast, Interactive Brokers offers access to over 150 markets globally, making it ideal for experienced traders requiring advanced tools and low commissions. While Fidelity is better suited for those prioritising simplicity and US-centric trading, Interactive Brokers attracts professionals seeking comprehensive international reach and sophisticated trading platforms.
Fidelity
Interactive Brokers
| Fidelity | Interactive Brokers | |
|---|---|---|
| BrokerRank Score | 3.6/5 | 4.4/5 ✓ |
| Min. Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spread from | 0 pips ✓ | 0.2 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1:2 | 1:4 ✓ |
| Regulation | SEC, CFTC | SEC, CFTC, FCA ✓ |
| Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
Interactive Brokers is the better choice overall, scoring 4.4/5 vs 3.6/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Fidelity offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowFidelity
Interactive Brokers
Fidelity
Lower feesInteractive Brokers
Fidelity is a well-established broker founded in 1946 and is headquartered in Boston, USA. It is regulated by prominent US regulatory bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Fidelity's long-standing presence in the financial industry, managing assets under management (AUM) of $11 trillion, instils a high level of trust and security for investors.
In contrast, Interactive Brokers, founded in 1978 and based in Greenwich, USA, is subject to a broader range of regulatory oversight. It holds licences from the SEC and CFTC in the US, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). This global regulatory framework enhances its appeal for international traders and offers a more comprehensive fund protection scheme.
Fidelity offers a competitive fee structure with spreads starting from 0 pips. The broker charges zero commissions on US stocks and ETFs, making it an attractive option for investors focused on the US market. Moreover, there are no account fees and the minimum deposit requirement is $0, which lowers the barrier to entry for new investors. However, Fidelity does not offer leverage beyond 1:2, limiting its appeal to those seeking higher leverage trading opportunities.
Interactive Brokers provides low-cost trading with spreads beginning at 0.2 pips and a commission of $0.005, which can be especially advantageous for high-frequency traders. The absence of a minimum deposit requirement is a shared benefit with Fidelity, but Interactive Brokers offers a higher leverage cap of 1:4. Despite these advantages, traders should be aware of potential inactivity fees for small accounts.
Both brokers offer proprietary web and mobile trading platforms. Fidelity's platforms are known for their robust research tools and screeners, which are beneficial for investors who value comprehensive analysis. However, the platforms can be challenging for complete beginners. Interactive Brokers, on the other hand, provides advanced trading tools suitable for professional traders. Its platform supports access to over 150 markets in 33 countries, but its complexity may deter novice traders.
For beginners, Fidelity is the preferred choice due to its zero commission on US stocks and ease of entry. Professionals will find Interactive Brokers more suitable with its advanced tools and extensive market access. When it comes to fees, Interactive Brokers offers a more competitive structure for frequent traders.
Fidelity
3.6/5
Choose Fidelity if you want…
Interactive Brokers
4.4/5
Choose Interactive Brokers if you want…
Interactive Brokers scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Fidelity holds a 3.6/5 rating vs Interactive Brokers's 4.4/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
Fidelity offers spreads from 0 pips, while Interactive Brokers starts at 0.2 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
Fidelity requires a minimum deposit of $0. Interactive Brokers requires $0.
Fidelity is regulated by SEC, CFTC, while Interactive Brokers holds licences from SEC, CFTC, FCA, MAS, ASIC.
Fidelity supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. Interactive Brokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.