Higher Rated
Interactive Brokers
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
In comparing FP Markets and Interactive Brokers, the key difference lies in their target audiences and trading conditions. FP Markets, with a rating of 3.84/5, appeals to traders seeking low entry costs and high leverage, making it ideal for forex and CFD enthusiasts who value tight spreads and the option to use TradingView. Conversely, Interactive Brokers, rated 4.43/5, caters to professional traders and investors who prioritise access to a wide range of global markets and sophisticated trading tools, albeit with a more complex platform and lower leverage. This comparison will help traders determine which broker aligns best with their trading style and financial goals.
FP Markets
Interactive Brokers
| FP Markets | Interactive Brokers | |
|---|---|---|
| BrokerRank Score | 3.8/5 | 4.4/5 ✓ |
| Min. Deposit | $100 | $0 ✓ |
| Spread from | 0 pips ✓ | 0.2 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 ✓ | 1:4 |
| Regulation | ASIC, CySEC | SEC, CFTC, FCA ✓ |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, TradingView | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
Interactive Brokers is the better choice overall, scoring 4.4/5 vs 3.8/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, FP Markets offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowFP Markets
Interactive Brokers
WinnerFP Markets
Interactive Brokers
FP Markets, established in 2005 and headquartered in Sydney, Australia, operates under the regulatory oversight of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC). These regulatory bodies ensure that FP Markets adheres to strict compliance standards, offering a degree of confidence to traders. The broker provides fund protection schemes that include segregated client funds, which adds an extra layer of security for investors.
Interactive Brokers, founded in 1978, boasts a more extensive regulatory framework, being regulated by prominent authorities such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), and ASIC. This extensive global regulation network ensures a high level of safety and compliance, with client funds held in segregated accounts as well, offering robust investor protection.
FP Markets offers competitive spreads starting from 0 pips on their Raw account, though it charges a commission of $3 per lot per side. The minimum deposit required to open an account is $100, which is relatively low compared to industry standards, making it accessible for a broad range of traders. The broker allows for maximum leverage of up to 1:500, but traders should be mindful of potential overnight fees that can accumulate on positions held overnight.
In contrast, Interactive Brokers offers spreads starting from 0.2 pips and is renowned for its very low commissions, set at 0.005 per share, which is particularly attractive for stock traders. There is no minimum deposit required to open an account, which can be appealing to beginners. However, the leverage offered is relatively low at 1:4, reflecting its focus on risk management. Interactive Brokers also imposes an inactivity fee for small accounts, which can be a disadvantage for less active traders.
FP Markets provides a versatile trading experience with access to popular platforms like MetaTrader 4 (MT4), MetaTrader 5 (MT5), TradingView, and a proprietary mobile platform. These platforms cater to a wide range of traders, offering customisability and advanced charting tools. On the other hand, Interactive Brokers uses its proprietary web and mobile platforms, renowned for their advanced trading tools and extensive market analysis features, making them ideal for experienced traders seeking comprehensive analytical capabilities.
For beginners, FP Markets is the better choice due to its lower minimum deposit and user-friendly platforms. However, for professional traders and those focused on fees, Interactive Brokers wins with its extensive market access and low commission structure.
FP Markets
3.8/5
Choose FP Markets if you want…
Interactive Brokers
4.4/5
Choose Interactive Brokers if you want…
Interactive Brokers scores higher overall on our independent rating system. FP Markets holds a 3.8/5 rating vs Interactive Brokers's 4.4/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
FP Markets offers spreads from 0 pips, while Interactive Brokers starts at 0.2 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
FP Markets requires a minimum deposit of $100. Interactive Brokers requires $0.
FP Markets is regulated by ASIC, CySEC, while Interactive Brokers holds licences from SEC, CFTC, FCA, MAS, ASIC.
FP Markets supports MT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary Mobile. Interactive Brokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.