FxOpen
Absa Stockbrokers
VS
Higher Rated
FxOpen
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
Compare FxOpen and Absa Stockbrokers side by side on fees, regulation, platforms and our expert ratings. Find out which broker suits your needs.
FxOpen
Absa Stockbrokers
Overall Rating
FxOpen
3.7 vs 3.2
Lowest Fees
Tied
0 vs 0 pips
Regulation
Tied
2 vs 2 licences
Min. Deposit
Absa Stockbrokers
$1 vs $0
FxOpen
Absa Stockbrokers
FxOpen
Absa Stockbrokers
Lower feesFxOpen scores 3.66/5 while Absa Stockbrokers scores 3.16/5 in our independent rating.
FxOpen edges ahead overall, but Absa Stockbrokers may suit traders who prioritise different features. Read our full reviews for a detailed breakdown. Scores are based on our transparent methodology.
FxOpen scores higher overall on our independent rating system. FxOpen holds a 3.7/5 rating vs Absa Stockbrokers's 3.2/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
FxOpen offers spreads from 0 pips, while Absa Stockbrokers starts at 0 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
FxOpen requires a minimum deposit of $1. Absa Stockbrokers requires $0.
FxOpen is regulated by FCA, ASIC, while Absa Stockbrokers holds licences from FSCA, JSE.
FxOpen supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Absa Stockbrokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.