Skip to main content
Side-by-Side Comparison Independent Updated Oct 2, 2026

Interactive Brokers vs FP Markets 2026: Which Broker is Better?

Choosing between Interactive Brokers and FP Markets depends on your trading style, preferred markets, and budget. Interactive Brokers is headquartered in Greenwich, USA, while FP Markets operates from Sydney, Australia. Interactive Brokers has the longer track record, established in 1978, compared to FP Markets which was founded in 2005. This in-depth comparison covers regulation, fees, platforms, markets, and overall ratings to help you decide which broker is the better fit in 2026.

Interactive Brokers

FP Markets

Higher ratedInteractive Brokers logo

Interactive Brokers

4.4/ 5
Visit Interactive Brokers →Full review
VS
Interactive BrokersFP Markets
BrokerRank Score4.4/5 ✓3.8/5
Min. Deposit$0 ✓$100
Spread from0.2 pips0 pips ✓
Max Leverage1:41:500 ✓
RegulationSEC, CFTC, FCA ✓ASIC, CySEC
PlatformsProprietary Web, Proprietary MobileMT4, MT5, TradingView
Quick VerdictBrokerRank recommends
Best for Beginners
Interactive BrokersFP Markets
Best for Low Fees
FP MarketsInteractive Brokers
Best for Regulation
Interactive BrokersFP Markets
Best Overall
Interactive BrokersFP Markets
Quick Answer

Interactive Brokers is the better choice overall, scoring 4.4/5 vs 3.8/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, FP Markets offers lower spreads (0 pips).

See full side-by-side comparison below

Interactive Brokers vs FP Markets: Key Differences

Feature

Interactive Brokers

Winner

FP Markets

Our Rating
4.4 / 5
3.8 / 5
Min. Deposit
$0
$100
Max Leverage
Spread From
0.2 pips
0 pips
Commission
$0.005/lot
$3/lot
Platforms
Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile
MT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary Mobile
Markets
Stocks, Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities
Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
Founded
1978
2005
Headquarters
Greenwich, USA
Sydney, Australia
Score
4 / 5
1 / 5

Still deciding between Interactive Brokers and FP Markets?

Skip the back-and-forth — answer 4 quick questions and we'll match you to your best fit.

Matching for:Travelling or on a VPN? Change it.
Find my match

Fees Comparison

Fee

Interactive Brokers

FP Markets

Spread From
0.2 pips
0 pips
Commission
$0.005/lot
$3/lot
Deposit Fee
None
None
Withdrawal Fee
None
None

Regulation & Trust

Interactive Brokers holds licences from SEC, CFTC, FCA. FP Markets is regulated by ASIC, CySEC.

Markets & Assets

Both brokers offer access to Stocks, Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities markets.

Fees & Spreads

On spreads, FP Markets is more competitive with EUR/USD spreads from 0.0 pips, compared to 0.2 pips at Interactive Brokers.

Trading Platforms

Interactive Brokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. FP Markets offers MT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary Mobile. Both brokers are available on Proprietary Mobile.

Minimum Deposit

Interactive Brokers requires no minimum deposit, while FP Markets sets a minimum deposit of $100. This makes Interactive Brokers accessible to traders with any budget.

Overall Ratings

BrokerRank scores Interactive Brokers at 4.43/5 and FP Markets at 3.84/5, based on 50+ data points covering regulation, fees, platforms, markets, and user experience. Interactive Brokers leads overall with a clear advantage.

BrokerRank Verdict

Interactive Brokers is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 4.43/5 versus FP Markets's 3.84/5. Interactive Brokers holds more tier-1 licences (SEC, CFTC, FCA), offering stronger regulatory protection. FP Markets has a fees advantage with 0.0 pip spreads. Interactive Brokers is more accessible for new traders with its lower minimum deposit requirement. FP Markets is still a solid option for traders who prefer FP Markets's specific platform or market selection, but Interactive Brokers offers a stronger overall package for the majority of traders.

Who Should Choose Which?

Interactive Brokers

Interactive Brokers

4.4/5

Top pick

Choose Interactive Brokers if you want…

  • Higher overall rating (4.4/5)
  • No minimum deposit
  • More regulatory licences (5)
  • More established (est. 1978)
FP Markets

FP Markets

3.8/5

Choose FP Markets if you want…

  • Tighter spreads (from 0 pips)
  • Higher leverage (up to 1:500)
  • More market types (6)
  • More platforms (4 supported)

Also consider

View all rankings

We earn a commission when you open an account through these links, at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are scored independently — see the full independent ranking.

#1ForTrade logo
ForTrade
4.3
FCA
Visit
#2FxPro logo
FxPro
4.1
FCA
Visit
#4AvaTrade logo
AvaTrade
4.0
MAS
Visit
#5Plus500 logo
Plus500
4.0
MAS
Visit

80% of retail CFD accounts lose money.

Both Interactive Brokers & FP Markets are available in

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Is Interactive Brokers better than FP Markets?

Interactive Brokers scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Interactive Brokers holds a 4.4/5 rating vs FP Markets's 3.8/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.

2

Which has lower fees, Interactive Brokers or FP Markets?

Interactive Brokers offers spreads from 0.2 pips, while FP Markets starts at 0 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.

3

What is the minimum deposit for Interactive Brokers vs FP Markets?

Interactive Brokers requires a minimum deposit of $0. FP Markets requires $100.

4

Which broker is safer, Interactive Brokers or FP Markets?

Interactive Brokers is regulated by SEC, CFTC, FCA, MAS, ASIC, while FP Markets holds licences from ASIC, CySEC.

5

What trading platforms do Interactive Brokers and FP Markets support?

Interactive Brokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. FP Markets supports MT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary Mobile.

6

Can I use both Interactive Brokers and FP Markets?

Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.

Key Trading Terms

Related Guides

More Comparisons

BrokerRank Research

Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.

Featured

Deriv

4.0
Open Account

Capital at risk · T&Cs apply