Skip to main content
Side-by-Side Comparison Independent Updated Oct 2, 2026

Interactive Brokers vs Phillip Nova 2026: Which Broker is Better?

Choosing between Interactive Brokers and Phillip Nova depends on your trading style, preferred markets, and budget. Interactive Brokers is headquartered in Greenwich, USA, while Phillip Nova operates from Singapore. Interactive Brokers has the longer track record, established in 1978, compared to Phillip Nova which was founded in 2005. This in-depth comparison covers regulation, fees, platforms, markets, and overall ratings to help you decide which broker is the better fit in 2026.

Interactive Brokers

Phillip Nova

Higher ratedInteractive Brokers logo

Interactive Brokers

4.4/ 5
Visit Interactive Brokers →Full review
VS
Interactive BrokersPhillip Nova
BrokerRank Score4.4/5 ✓3.4/5
Min. Deposit$0$0
Spread from0.2 pips ✓0.6 pips
Max Leverage1:41:20 ✓
RegulationSEC, CFTC, FCA ✓MAS
PlatformsProprietary Web, Proprietary MobileProprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, POEMS
Quick VerdictBrokerRank recommends
Best for Beginners
Interactive BrokersPhillip Nova
Best for Low Fees
Interactive BrokersPhillip Nova
Best for Regulation
Interactive BrokersPhillip Nova
Best Overall
Interactive BrokersPhillip Nova
Quick Answer

Interactive Brokers is the better choice overall, scoring 4.4/5 vs 3.4/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Interactive Brokers offers lower spreads (0.2 pips).

See full side-by-side comparison below

Interactive Brokers vs Phillip Nova: Key Differences

Feature

Interactive Brokers

Winner

Phillip Nova

Our Rating
4.4 / 5
3.4 / 5
Min. Deposit
$0
$0
Max Leverage
Spread From
0.2 pips
0.6 pips
Commission
$0.005/lot
None
Regulated By
Platforms
Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile
Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, POEMS
Markets
Stocks, Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities
Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
Founded
1978
2005
Headquarters
Greenwich, USA
Singapore
Score
3 / 4
1 / 4

Still deciding between Interactive Brokers and Phillip Nova?

Skip the back-and-forth — answer 4 quick questions and we'll match you to your best fit.

Matching for:Travelling or on a VPN? Change it.
Find my match

Fees Comparison

Fee

Interactive Brokers

Phillip Nova

Spread From
0.2 pips
0.6 pips
Commission
$0.005/lot
None
Deposit Fee
None
None
Withdrawal Fee
None
None

Regulation & Trust

Interactive Brokers holds licences from SEC, CFTC, FCA. Phillip Nova is regulated by MAS.

Markets & Assets

Both brokers offer access to Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities markets. Interactive Brokers additionally covers Stocks. Phillip Nova adds Crypto.

Fees & Spreads

On spreads, Interactive Brokers is more competitive with EUR/USD spreads from 0.2 pips, compared to 0.6 pips at Phillip Nova.

Trading Platforms

Interactive Brokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. Phillip Nova offers Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, POEMS. Both brokers are available on Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile.

Minimum Deposit

Interactive Brokers requires no minimum deposit, while Phillip Nova sets no minimum deposit. This makes Interactive Brokers accessible to traders with any budget.

Overall Ratings

BrokerRank scores Interactive Brokers at 4.43/5 and Phillip Nova at 3.39/5, based on 50+ data points covering regulation, fees, platforms, markets, and user experience. Interactive Brokers leads overall with a clear advantage.

BrokerRank Verdict

Interactive Brokers is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 4.43/5 versus Phillip Nova's 3.39/5. Interactive Brokers holds more tier-1 licences (SEC, CFTC, FCA), offering stronger regulatory protection. Interactive Brokers also provides tighter spreads (0.2 pips) versus 0.6 pips at Phillip Nova. Phillip Nova is still a solid option for traders who prefer Phillip Nova's specific platform or market selection, but Interactive Brokers offers a stronger overall package for the majority of traders.

Who Should Choose Which?

Interactive Brokers

Interactive Brokers

4.4/5

Top pick

Choose Interactive Brokers if you want…

  • Higher overall rating (4.4/5)
  • Tighter spreads (from 0.2 pips)
  • More regulatory licences (5)
  • More established (est. 1978)
Phillip Nova

Phillip Nova

3.4/5

Choose Phillip Nova if you want…

  • No per-trade commission
  • Higher leverage (up to 1:20)
  • More platforms (3 supported)

Also consider

View all rankings

We earn a commission when you open an account through these links, at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are scored independently — see the full independent ranking.

#1ForTrade logo
ForTrade
4.3
FCA
Visit
#2FxPro logo
FxPro
4.1
FCA
Visit
#4AvaTrade logo
AvaTrade
4.0
MAS
Visit
#5Plus500 logo
Plus500
4.0
MAS
Visit

80% of retail CFD accounts lose money.

Both Interactive Brokers & Phillip Nova are available in

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Is Interactive Brokers better than Phillip Nova?

Interactive Brokers scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Interactive Brokers holds a 4.4/5 rating vs Phillip Nova's 3.4/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.

2

Which has lower fees, Interactive Brokers or Phillip Nova?

Interactive Brokers offers spreads from 0.2 pips, while Phillip Nova starts at 0.6 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.

3

What is the minimum deposit for Interactive Brokers vs Phillip Nova?

Interactive Brokers requires a minimum deposit of $0. Phillip Nova requires $0.

4

Which broker is safer, Interactive Brokers or Phillip Nova?

Interactive Brokers is regulated by SEC, CFTC, FCA, MAS, ASIC, while Phillip Nova holds licences from MAS.

5

What trading platforms do Interactive Brokers and Phillip Nova support?

Interactive Brokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. Phillip Nova supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, POEMS.

6

Can I use both Interactive Brokers and Phillip Nova?

Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.

Key Trading Terms

Related Guides

More Comparisons

BrokerRank Research

Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.

Featured

Deriv

4.0
Open Account

Capital at risk · T&Cs apply