Higher Rated
Interactive Brokers
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
When comparing Interactive Brokers and Stake, the key difference lies in their market offerings and target audiences. Interactive Brokers, established in 1978, caters to professional traders with its comprehensive range of instruments including stocks, forex, CFDs, and commodities, alongside advanced trading tools and low commissions. In contrast, Stake, founded in 2017, appeals to beginner and cost-conscious traders by providing commission-free trading on US, AU, and UK stocks, with a user-friendly platform but limited to stock markets only. While Interactive Brokers is suited for experienced traders seeking diverse global market access, Stake is ideal for those prioritising simplicity and zero commission on stock trades.
Interactive Brokers
Stake
| Interactive Brokers | Stake | |
|---|---|---|
| BrokerRank Score | 4.4/5 ✓ | 3.4/5 |
| Min. Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spread from | 0.2 pips | 0 pips ✓ |
| Max Leverage | 1:4 ✓ | 1:1 |
| Regulation | SEC, CFTC, FCA ✓ | ASIC, FCA |
| Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
Interactive Brokers is the better choice overall, scoring 4.4/5 vs 3.4/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Stake offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowInteractive Brokers
Stake
Interactive Brokers
Stake
Lower feesInteractive Brokers is a well-established entity in the brokerage industry, boasting regulation by top-tier bodies such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). This extensive regulatory oversight provides a high level of safety and fund protection for traders, making it a reliable choice for international investors.
On the other hand, Stake, a newer player in the market, is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). While Stake does not match the breadth of regulatory oversight seen with Interactive Brokers, it still offers a solid level of security for its users, particularly in its key markets such as Australia, the UK, Brazil, and New Zealand. However, it lacks the global reach and comprehensive protection schemes available with Interactive Brokers.
Interactive Brokers is renowned for its competitive fee structure. The broker offers spreads starting from 0.2 pips, with a commission rate of $0.005 per trade. There is no minimum deposit requirement, making it accessible for traders of various profiles. Additionally, the broker provides a maximum leverage of 1:4, catering to a range of trading strategies. While the fees are generally low, traders should be aware of inactivity fees applicable to small accounts.
Stake, however, distinguishes itself by offering commission-free trading on US, Australian, and UK stocks, with spreads starting from 0 pips. This makes it an attractive option for cost-conscious stock traders. Nevertheless, Stake imposes a foreign exchange conversion fee ranging from 0.5% to 0.7%, which can add up for traders dealing with multiple currencies. The broker also offers zero minimum deposit but does not provide leverage beyond 1:1, limiting its appeal to leveraged trading enthusiasts.
Interactive Brokers provides a proprietary web and mobile platform known for its advanced tools and features, tailored for professional traders who require sophisticated analysis capabilities. Despite its robustness, the platform's complexity might deter beginners. Conversely, Stake's proprietary web and mobile platforms are designed with simplicity and user-friendliness in mind, offering a clean, modern interface that suits new investors, although it lacks the deep analytical tools that advanced traders might seek.
For beginners, Stake is the clear winner due to its user-friendly interface and commission-free structure. For professional traders, Interactive Brokers offers unmatched tools and global market access. When it comes to fees, Stake provides greater savings for stock traders, while Interactive Brokers is more suited to those trading a broader range of assets.
Interactive Brokers
4.4/5
Choose Interactive Brokers if you want…
Stake
3.4/5
Choose Stake if you want…
Interactive Brokers scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Interactive Brokers holds a 4.4/5 rating vs Stake's 3.4/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
Interactive Brokers offers spreads from 0.2 pips, while Stake starts at 0 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
Interactive Brokers requires a minimum deposit of $0. Stake requires $0.
Interactive Brokers is regulated by SEC, CFTC, FCA, MAS, ASIC, while Stake holds licences from ASIC, FCA.
Interactive Brokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. Stake supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.