Higher Rated
LiteFinance
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
In this broker comparison, we examine LiteFinance and Public.com, highlighting their distinct offerings and target audiences. LiteFinance, founded in 2005, caters to experienced traders seeking diverse market access, including forex, CFDs, and commodities, with competitive ECN spreads and robust trading platforms like MT4 and MT5. In contrast, Public.com, launched in 2019, appeals to novice investors with its commission-free stock and crypto trading, simplified mobile-only platform, and social investing features. While LiteFinance offers extensive leverage and advanced tools for international markets, Public.com focuses on U.S.-based investors with straightforward, cost-effective trading options.
LiteFinance
Public.com
| LiteFinance | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|
| BrokerRank Score | 3.4/5 ✓ | 3.0/5 |
| Min. Deposit | $50 | $0 ✓ |
| Spread from | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 ✓ | 1:1 |
| Regulation | CySEC, FSA ✓ | SEC |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web | Proprietary Mobile |
LiteFinance is the better choice overall, scoring 3.4/5 vs 3.0/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, LiteFinance offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowLiteFinance
Public.com
WinnerLiteFinance
Public.com
Lower feesLiteFinance
3.4/5
Choose LiteFinance if you want…
Public.com
3.0/5
Choose Public.com if you want…
LiteFinance scores higher overall on our independent rating system. LiteFinance holds a 3.4/5 rating vs Public.com's 3.0/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
LiteFinance offers spreads from 0 pips, while Public.com starts at 0 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
LiteFinance requires a minimum deposit of $50. Public.com requires $0.
LiteFinance is regulated by CySEC, FSA, while Public.com holds licences from SEC.
LiteFinance supports MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web. Public.com supports Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.