Higher Rated
OANDA
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
In the comparison between Markets.com and OANDA, traders will find distinct advantages catering to different needs and preferences. Markets.com appeals to those seeking a diverse range of over 2000 instruments and robust educational resources, ideal for traders looking for variety and learning support, although it requires a higher minimum deposit and charges inactivity fees. On the other hand, OANDA, with no minimum deposit requirement and availability in the US, is well-suited for beginner traders and those valuing flexibility and accessibility, despite offering a more limited product range and lacking MT5 support. Both brokers provide competitive spreads starting from 0.6 pips and are regulated by multiple reputable authorities, though they do not match the tighter spreads of ECN brokers.
Markets.com
OANDA
| Markets.com | OANDA | |
|---|---|---|
| BrokerRank Score | 3.8/5 | 4.1/5 ✓ |
| Min. Deposit | $100 | $0 ✓ |
| Spread from | 0.6 pips | 0.6 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1:300 ✓ | 1:50 |
| Regulation | CySEC, ASIC, FCA | FCA, CFTC, ASIC ✓ |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web | MT4, Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
OANDA is the better choice overall, scoring 4.1/5 vs 3.8/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Markets.com offers lower spreads (0.6 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowMarkets.com
OANDA
WinnerMarkets.com
OANDA
Markets.com is regulated by several reputable authorities, including the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). These regulatory bodies ensure that Markets.com adheres to stringent financial standards and provides robust investor protection measures. The broker's clients benefit from fund protection schemes including segregated accounts, which enhance the safety of client funds.
OANDA, on the other hand, is regulated by an even broader array of authorities, namely the FCA in the UK, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in the USA, ASIC, and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). OANDA's multi-jurisdictional regulation offers an additional layer of security. The broker also provides segregated accounts and is well-regarded for its transparency and compliance with global financial standards, making it a trusted choice for many traders.
Markets.com offers spreads starting from 0.6 pips with no additional commissions on trades. This structure is appealing for traders seeking straightforward pricing without the complexity of commission fees. However, the broker does have an inactivity fee, and its minimum deposit requirement is $100, which might be higher than some traders prefer. Overnight fees also apply, which can add to the cost of holding positions overnight.
OANDA also offers spreads from 0.6 pips and charges no commissions. A standout feature of OANDA is its no minimum deposit policy, which allows traders to enter the market with any amount they are comfortable with. This flexibility is particularly advantageous for beginners or those with limited capital. Like Markets.com, OANDA also applies overnight fees, but its overall fee structure is competitive, especially given the absence of a minimum deposit requirement.
Markets.com provides access to MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5) alongside its proprietary web platform, offering a comprehensive suite for traders who seek advanced charting tools and automated trading capabilities. OANDA, however, offers MT4, its own proprietary web, and mobile platforms, though it lacks support for MT5. OANDA's platforms are known for user-friendliness and accessibility, complemented by historical data and API access, catering well to tech-savvy traders.
For beginners, OANDA takes the edge due to its no minimum deposit policy and user-friendly platforms. For professional traders, Markets.com offers a better range of instruments and higher leverage. On fees, both brokers offer competitive spreads, but OANDA's flexibility with no minimum deposit gives it a slight advantage.
Markets.com
3.8/5
Choose Markets.com if you want…
OANDA
4.1/5
Choose OANDA if you want…
OANDA scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Markets.com holds a 3.8/5 rating vs OANDA's 4.1/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
Markets.com offers spreads from 0.6 pips, while OANDA starts at 0.6 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
Markets.com requires a minimum deposit of $100. OANDA requires $0.
Markets.com is regulated by CySEC, ASIC, FCA, while OANDA holds licences from FCA, CFTC, ASIC, MAS.
Markets.com supports MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web. OANDA supports MT4, Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.