Higher Rated
Forex.com
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
Compare Sarwa and Forex.com side by side on fees, regulation, platforms and our expert ratings. Find out which broker suits your needs.
Sarwa
Forex.com
Forex.com is the better choice overall, scoring 4.4/5 vs 3.3/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Sarwa offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowOverall Rating
Forex.com
3.3 vs 4.4
Lowest Fees
Sarwa
0 vs 0.8 pips
Regulation
Forex.com
2 vs 4 licences
Min. Deposit
Forex.com
$500 vs $100
Sarwa
Forex.com
WinnerSarwa
Lower feesForex.com
Sarwa scores 3.34/5 while Forex.com scores 4.40/5 in our independent rating.
Forex.com edges ahead overall, but Sarwa may suit traders who prioritise different features. Read our full reviews for a detailed breakdown. Scores are based on our transparent methodology.
Forex.com scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Sarwa holds a 3.3/5 rating vs Forex.com's 4.4/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
Sarwa offers spreads from 0 pips, while Forex.com starts at 0.8 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
Sarwa requires a minimum deposit of $500. Forex.com requires $100.
Sarwa is regulated by DFSA, SEC, while Forex.com holds licences from FCA, CFTC, ASIC, MAS.
Sarwa supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. Forex.com supports MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.