Stake
IronFX
VS
Higher Rated
IronFX
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
Compare Stake and IronFX side by side on fees, regulation, platforms and our expert ratings. Find out which broker suits your needs.
Stake
IronFX
IronFX is the better choice overall, scoring 3.7/5 vs 3.4/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Stake offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowOverall Rating
IronFX
3.4 vs 3.7
Lowest Fees
Tied
0 vs 0 pips
Regulation
IronFX
2 vs 4 licences
Min. Deposit
Stake
$0 vs $100
Stake
IronFX
Stake
Lower feesIronFX
Stake scores 3.44/5 while IronFX scores 3.71/5 in our independent rating.
IronFX edges ahead overall, but Stake may suit traders who prioritise different features. Read our full reviews for a detailed breakdown. Scores are based on our transparent methodology.
IronFX scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Stake holds a 3.4/5 rating vs IronFX's 3.7/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
Stake offers spreads from 0 pips, while IronFX starts at 0 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
Stake requires a minimum deposit of $0. IronFX requires $100.
Stake is regulated by ASIC, FCA, while IronFX holds licences from CySEC, FCA, ASIC, FSCA.
Stake supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. IronFX supports MT4, MT5.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.