Higher Rated
Dukascopy
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
Compare Tiger Brokers and Dukascopy side by side on fees, regulation, platforms and our expert ratings. Find out which broker suits your needs.
Tiger Brokers
Dukascopy
Dukascopy is the better choice overall, scoring 3.7/5 vs 3.6/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Tiger Brokers offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowOverall Rating
Dukascopy
3.6 vs 3.7
Lowest Fees
Tiger Brokers
0 vs 0.1 pips
Regulation
Tied
2 vs 2 licences
Min. Deposit
Tiger Brokers
$0 vs $100
Tiger Brokers
WinnerDukascopy
Tiger Brokers
Lower feesDukascopy
Tiger Brokers scores 3.58/5 while Dukascopy scores 3.71/5 in our independent rating.
Dukascopy edges ahead overall, but Tiger Brokers may suit traders who prioritise different features. Read our full reviews for a detailed breakdown. Scores are based on our transparent methodology.
Dukascopy scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Tiger Brokers holds a 3.6/5 rating vs Dukascopy's 3.7/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
Tiger Brokers offers spreads from 0 pips, while Dukascopy starts at 0.1 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
Tiger Brokers requires a minimum deposit of $0. Dukascopy requires $100.
Tiger Brokers is regulated by MAS, ASIC, while Dukascopy holds licences from FCA, MAS.
Tiger Brokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. Dukascopy supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.