Higher Rated
FxOpen
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
Compare Tiger Brokers and FxOpen side by side on fees, regulation, platforms and our expert ratings. Find out which broker suits your needs.
Tiger Brokers
FxOpen
FxOpen is the better choice overall, scoring 3.7/5 vs 3.6/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Tiger Brokers offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowOverall Rating
FxOpen
3.6 vs 3.7
Lowest Fees
Tied
0 vs 0 pips
Regulation
Tied
2 vs 2 licences
Min. Deposit
Tiger Brokers
$0 vs $1
Tiger Brokers
WinnerFxOpen
Tiger Brokers
Lower feesFxOpen
Tiger Brokers scores 3.58/5 while FxOpen scores 3.66/5 in our independent rating.
FxOpen edges ahead overall, but Tiger Brokers may suit traders who prioritise different features. Read our full reviews for a detailed breakdown. Scores are based on our transparent methodology.
FxOpen scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Tiger Brokers holds a 3.6/5 rating vs FxOpen's 3.7/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
Tiger Brokers offers spreads from 0 pips, while FxOpen starts at 0 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
Tiger Brokers requires a minimum deposit of $0. FxOpen requires $1.
Tiger Brokers is regulated by MAS, ASIC, while FxOpen holds licences from FCA, ASIC.
Tiger Brokers supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile. FxOpen supports MT4, MT5, cTrader.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.