Higher Rated
IG Group
Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
In this broker comparison, we examine IG Group and Trading 212, two prominent platforms with distinct offerings. IG Group, with a rating of 4.33/5, is ideal for experienced traders seeking access to over 17,000 markets, including CFDs, forex, and cryptocurrencies, backed by top-tier regulation and advanced research tools. In contrast, Trading 212, rated 3.57/5, appeals to beginner and cost-conscious investors with its user-friendly app, commission-free stock trading, and low minimum deposit requirement of £1. The key difference lies in IG's extensive market access and sophisticated tools versus Trading 212's accessibility and simplicity.
IG Group
Trading 212
| IG Group | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|
| BrokerRank Score | 4.3/5 ✓ | 3.6/5 |
| Min. Deposit | $250 | $1 ✓ |
| Spread from | 0.6 pips | 0.5 pips ✓ |
| Max Leverage | 1:200 ✓ | 1:30 |
| Regulation | FCA, ASIC, MAS ✓ | FCA, CySEC |
| Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4 | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
IG Group is the better choice overall, scoring 4.3/5 vs 3.6/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Trading 212 offers lower spreads (0.5 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowIG Group
Trading 212
IG Group
Trading 212
Lower feesIG Group, established in 1974, is a heavyweight in the brokerage industry, with over 50 years of experience. It is regulated by multiple top-tier authorities, including the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This extensive regulatory oversight provides a robust safety net for traders, ensuring compliance with stringent financial standards and offering significant fund protection schemes.
Trading 212, founded in 2004, is also regulated by the FCA and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC). While its regulatory coverage is solid, it is not as extensive as IG Group's global reach. Trading 212 offers client fund protection via segregated accounts, ensuring that customer funds are kept separate from the company's operational funds. Both brokers provide a secure trading environment, but IG Group's broader regulatory framework offers additional peace of mind.
IG Group offers competitive spreads starting from 0.6 pips on forex pairs, with zero commission on trades. However, it requires a minimum deposit of $250, which might be a barrier for some traders. IG Group charges an inactivity fee if your account remains dormant for two years, and its complex fee structure requires careful consideration. Overnight fees, or swap rates, apply to positions held open beyond the trading day, and these can vary significantly depending on the asset class.
Trading 212 offers spreads starting from 0.5 pips on forex, also with zero commission, making it very appealing to cost-conscious traders. It distinguishes itself with a remarkably low minimum deposit requirement of just £1, making it accessible to budding investors. Trading 212's fee structure is simpler, with no inactivity fees, making it an attractive option for those seeking straightforward pricing. However, its CFD spreads are not the tightest, which could impact profitability for active traders.
IG Group provides a variety of trading platforms, including its proprietary web and mobile platforms, as well as the popular MetaTrader 4 (MT4), known for its advanced charting capabilities and automated trading features. Trading 212, on the other hand, offers its proprietary web and mobile platforms, which are praised for their simplicity and user-friendly interfaces. However, it does not support MT4 or MT5, which may be a limitation for traders seeking advanced features and customisation.
For beginners, Trading 212 emerges as the winner due to its low entry cost and user-friendly platforms. For professionals seeking extensive research tools and a wide array of markets, IG Group is the superior choice. In terms of fees, Trading 212 offers a more straightforward and cost-effective structure, particularly for stock investors.
IG Group
4.3/5
Choose IG Group if you want…
Trading 212
3.6/5
Choose Trading 212 if you want…
IG Group scores higher overall on our independent rating system. IG Group holds a 4.3/5 rating vs Trading 212's 3.6/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
IG Group offers spreads from 0.6 pips, while Trading 212 starts at 0.5 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
IG Group requires a minimum deposit of $250. Trading 212 requires $1.
IG Group is regulated by FCA, ASIC, MAS, SEC, while Trading 212 holds licences from FCA, CySEC.
IG Group supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4. Trading 212 supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile.
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across 345 brokers
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.