Public.com vs Trading 212 2026: Which Broker is Better?
In the ever-evolving landscape of online trading, Public.com and Trading 212 present distinct offerings tailored to different types of investors. Public.com, with its focus on commission-free stocks, ETFs, and a unique social investing feed, appeals primarily to novice traders in the US market who prefer a mobile-only experience. In contrast, Trading 212 caters to traders in the UK and beyond, offering a broader range of markets including CFDs and forex, making it suitable for more experienced traders seeking a comprehensive platform with slightly higher leverage options. While Public.com stands out for its community-driven approach and alternative asset offerings, Trading 212 differentiates itself through its regulatory compliance in multiple jurisdictions and versatile account options.
Public.com
Trading 212
| Public.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|
| BrokerRank Score | 3.0/5 | 3.6/5 ✓ |
| Min. Deposit | $0 ✓ | $1 |
| Spread from | 0 pips ✓ | 0.5 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1:1 | 1:30 ✓ |
| Regulation | SEC | FCA, CySEC ✓ |
| Platforms | Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
Trading 212 is the better choice overall, scoring 3.6/5 vs 3.0/5 on BrokerRank's independent rating. On fees, Public.com offers lower spreads (0 pips).
See full side-by-side comparison belowPublic.com vs Trading 212: Key Differences
Public.com
Trading 212
Still deciding between Public.com and Trading 212?
Skip the back-and-forth — answer 4 quick questions and we'll match you to your best fit.
Fees Comparison
Public.com
Lower feesTrading 212
BrokerRank Verdict
Who Should Choose Which?
Public.com
3.0/5
Choose Public.com if you want…
- Tighter spreads (from 0 pips)
- No minimum deposit
Trading 212
3.6/5
Choose Trading 212 if you want…
- Higher overall rating (3.6/5)
- Higher leverage (up to 1:30)
- More regulatory licences (2)
- More market types (5)
Also consider
We earn a commission when you open an account through these links, at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are scored independently — see the full independent ranking.
Frequently Asked Questions
1Is Public.com better than Trading 212?
Trading 212 scores higher overall on our independent rating system. Public.com holds a 3.0/5 rating vs Trading 212's 3.6/5. The best choice ultimately depends on your trading style — see our full verdict above for a detailed breakdown.
2Which has lower fees, Public.com or Trading 212?
Public.com offers spreads from 0 pips, while Trading 212 starts at 0.5 pips. Check the fees section above for a full breakdown.
3What is the minimum deposit for Public.com vs Trading 212?
Public.com requires a minimum deposit of $0. Trading 212 requires $1.
4Which broker is safer, Public.com or Trading 212?
Public.com is regulated by SEC, while Trading 212 holds licences from FCA, CySEC.
5What trading platforms do Public.com and Trading 212 support?
Public.com supports Proprietary Mobile. Trading 212 supports Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile.
6Can I use both Public.com and Trading 212?
Yes, you can hold accounts at multiple brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across platforms to access different markets and tools.
Key Trading Terms
Related Guides
More Comparisons
BrokerRank Research
Only 26% of Brokers Are Truly Fee-Free
BrokerRank Research — Hidden costs across our broker database
58% of Brokers Hold a Single Licence
BrokerRank Research — Regulation quality analysis
71% of Retail Traders Lose Money
BrokerRank Research — Loss rates across 50 EU brokers
76% of Brokers Use Proprietary Platforms
BrokerRank Research — MT4 vs MT5 vs proprietary
Trading involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital at risk. Full risk disclosure.
Featured
Deriv
4.0Capital at risk · T&Cs apply
